What is a MET?
MET stands for Metabolic Equivalent of Task. One MET equals the energy cost of sitting quietly, about 1 calorie per kg of body weight per hour. Brisk walking has a MET of 4.8, meaning it burns 4.8× the calories of sitting still.
Find out how many calories you burn walking, based on your weight, pace, and time, distance, or step count. Adjust for incline and added weight. Uses MET values from the 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities, the same reference used by fitness trackers and exercise physiologists.
Three input modes. Uses 2024 Compendium MET values.
Fixed duration (30 min). Calorie burn scales linearly with weight and pace.
| Weight | Slow | Moderate | Brisk | Very brisk | Power walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 lb | 80 cal | 109 cal | 137 cal | 157 cal | 200 cal |
| 140 lb | 93 cal | 127 cal | 160 cal | 183 cal | 233 cal |
| 160 lb | 107 cal | 145 cal | 183 cal | 210 cal | 267 cal |
| 180 lb | 120 cal | 163 cal | 206 cal | 236 cal | 300 cal |
| 200 lb | 133 cal | 181 cal | 229 cal | 262 cal | 333 cal |
| 220 lb | 147 cal | 199 cal | 251 cal | 288 cal | 367 cal |
| 250 lb | 167 cal | 226 cal | 286 cal | 327 cal | 417 cal |
Per-mile burn depends mainly on body weight. Pace has only a small effect because faster walking takes less time.
| Weight | Easy 2.5 mph | Moderate 3.1 mph | Brisk 3.7 mph | Very brisk 4.2 mph | Power walk 4.7 mph |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 lb (54 kg) | 69 cal | 70 cal | 74 cal | 75 cal | 85 cal |
| 140 lb (64 kg) | 80 cal | 82 cal | 87 cal | 87 cal | 99 cal |
| 160 lb (73 kg) | 91 cal | 93 cal | 99 cal | 100 cal | 113 cal |
| 180 lb (82 kg) | 103 cal | 105 cal | 111 cal | 112 cal | 128 cal |
| 200 lb (91 kg) | 114 cal | 117 cal | 124 cal | 125 cal | 142 cal |
| 220 lb (100 kg) | 126 cal | 128 cal | 136 cal | 137 cal | 156 cal |
| 250 lb (113 kg) | 143 cal | 146 cal | 154 cal | 156 cal | 177 cal |
| 280 lb (127 kg) | 160 cal | 163 cal | 173 cal | 175 cal | 199 cal |
Brisk pace (MET 4.8) at average stride length (height 5'8"). 2,255 steps ≈ 1 mile at this stride.
| Weight | 2,500 steps | 5,000 steps | 7,500 steps | 10,000 steps | 15,000 steps | 20,000 steps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 lb (54 kg) | 82 cal | 164 cal | 247 cal | 329 cal | 493 cal | 658 cal |
| 140 lb (64 kg) | 96 cal | 192 cal | 288 cal | 384 cal | 575 cal | 767 cal |
| 160 lb (73 kg) | 110 cal | 219 cal | 329 cal | 438 cal | 658 cal | 877 cal |
| 180 lb (82 kg) | 123 cal | 247 cal | 370 cal | 493 cal | 740 cal | 986 cal |
| 200 lb (91 kg) | 137 cal | 274 cal | 411 cal | 548 cal | 822 cal | 1,096 cal |
| 220 lb (100 kg) | 151 cal | 301 cal | 452 cal | 603 cal | 904 cal | 1,206 cal |
| 250 lb (113 kg) | 171 cal | 343 cal | 514 cal | 685 cal | 1,028 cal | 1,370 cal |
| 280 lb (127 kg) | 192 cal | 384 cal | 575 cal | 767 cal | 1,151 cal | 1,535 cal |
All values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities (Ainsworth, Herrmann, et al.). MET stands for Metabolic Equivalent of Task. 1 MET equals the energy cost of sitting quietly (about 1 kcal/kg/hour).
| Activity | MET | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Walking, less than 2.0 mph (strolling) | 2.3 | Very slow stroll, window-shopping pace |
| Walking, 2.0 to 2.4 mph (slow) | 2.8 | Casual stroll on firm surface |
| Walking, 2.5 mph (easy) | 3.0 | Slow but purposeful |
| Walking the dog | 3.0 | Frequent stops factored in |
| Walking, 2.8 to 3.4 mph (moderate) | 3.8 | Common comfortable pace |
| Walking, 3.5 to 3.9 mph (brisk, exercise) | 4.8 | Standard "brisk walking" definition |
| Walking, 4.0 to 4.4 mph (very brisk) | 5.5 | Pushing the pace, breath quickening |
| Walking, 4.5 to 4.9 mph (power walk) | 7.0 | Approaches jogging effort |
| Walking, 5.0 to 5.5 mph | 8.5 | Very fast; jogging is usually more efficient |
| Race walking | 6.5 | Competitive style with rule-bound technique |
| Activity | MET | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Hills, no load, 1 to 5% grade, moderate-brisk | 5.3 | Gentle incline at exercise pace |
| Hills, no load, 6 to 10% grade, moderate-brisk | 7.0 | Noticeable hill |
| Hills, no load, 11 to 20% grade, slow-moderate | 8.8 | Steep climb |
| Hills, no load, 4.0 to 5.0 mph, 3 to 5% grade | 10.0 | Very fast pace on moderate grade |
| Hills, no load, very steep 30 to 40% grade | 15.5 | Mountainous terrain |
| Walking, treadmill, 3.5 to 3.9 mph, 0% grade | 4.8 | Same as level outdoor brisk |
| Walking, treadmill, 4.5 to 4.9 mph, 0% grade | 6.8 | Treadmill power walk |
| Activity | MET | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Walking with day pack, level ground | 3.5 | Light pack, urban |
| Carrying 5 to 14 lb load, level, moderate | 4.0 | Suitcase, groceries |
| Carrying 15 to 155 lb load, level, slow | 4.5 | Heavy load, slower pace |
| Carrying 50 to 150 lb load, level, moderate | 6.5 | Equipment hauling |
| Pushing stroller, 2.5 to 3.1 mph | 3.8 | Includes the push effort |
| Backpacking (general) | 7.0 | Traditional pack-carrying hike |
| Backpacking, hiking with daypack | 7.8 | Organized walking with daypack |
| Hiking, cross-country | 6.0 | No specified load, off-trail |
| Activity | MET | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Nordic walking, 2.5 to 3.5 mph, level, moderate | 4.3 | Most common pole-walking pace |
| Nordic walking, 3.6 to 4.4 mph, level, moderate | 5.3 | Brisk pole walking |
| Nordic walking, 4.5 to 5.0 mph, level, fast | 8.5 | Athletic pole walking |
| Nordic walking, uphill, moderate pace | 8.8 | Uphill with poles |
| Nordic walking, level, 20 to 30 lb load | 10.8 | Loaded pole walk |
Source: 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. For walkers 60+, the calculator scales these MET values up by ~10% per the 2024 Older Adult Compendium, reflecting reduced metabolic efficiency in older adults.
MET stands for Metabolic Equivalent of Task. One MET equals the energy cost of sitting quietly, about 1 calorie per kg of body weight per hour. Brisk walking has a MET of 4.8, meaning it burns 4.8× the calories of sitting still.
Calories = (Time in minutes × MET × 3.5 × Body weight in kg) ÷ 200
For a 165 lb (75 kg) person walking briskly (MET 4.8) for 30 minutes: (30 × 4.8 × 3.5 × 75) ÷ 200 = 189 calories.
Pace doubles or triples calorie burn rate. A 165 lb walker at slow pace (MET 2.8) burns ~110 calories per 30 minutes; at very brisk (MET 5.5) about 215. Increasing pace by even 0.5 mph delivers a meaningful boost without adding time.
The 2024 Older Adult Compendium found that walkers aged 60+ burn about 10% more calories at the same pace than younger walkers. This is due to reduced metabolic efficiency. The calculator includes a "60+" toggle that applies this adjustment.
MET-based estimates are accurate to roughly ±20 to 30%. Real-world burn varies by fitness, body composition, age, weather, and gait. Use as a planning estimate and for tracking trends over time. The MET reference value of 1 was originally derived from a healthy 40-year-old male weighing 70 kg, so individuals whose body composition or metabolic rate differs significantly will see real-world calorie burn that varies from the estimate.
Walking uphill at a 6 to 10% grade roughly doubles your MET (from 4.8 to about 7.0), comparable to slow jogging on level ground. Adding weight in a backpack or weighted vest increases calorie burn proportionally. A 165 lb walker carrying a 20 lb pack effectively walks as a 185 lb person. Weighted vest walking is popular for low-impact training because it adds load without joint stress. Wrist and ankle weights can change gait in ways that cause injury. Stick to vests or backpacks.
The popular "2,000 steps = 1 mile" estimate works for an average adult but varies considerably by height. The standard formula approximates stride length as 41.3% of standing height. A 5'8" person has a stride of about 28 inches, or 2,260 steps per mile. Taller walkers cover more distance per step. If your fitness tracker reports steps and distance separately, it's doing this same conversion.
Walking is among the most accessible and sustainable forms of cardiovascular exercise. The thermodynamic rule of weight loss is that 3,500 calories of net deficit equals about 1 pound of body fat (7,700 calories per kilogram). Real-world weight loss is more complex. Your body partially compensates by reducing non-exercise movement and increasing appetite, but walking still creates a meaningful caloric impact when sustained.
| Walking schedule | Per session | Per week | Loss/week | Loss/month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min, 3 days/week | 189 cal | 567 cal | 0.16 lb | 0.7 lb |
| 30 min, 5 days/week | 189 cal | 945 cal | 0.27 lb | 1.2 lb |
| 45 min, 5 days/week | 284 cal | 1,418 cal | 0.41 lb | 1.8 lb |
| 60 min, 5 days/week | 378 cal | 1,890 cal | 0.54 lb | 2.4 lb |
| 60 min, 7 days/week | 378 cal | 2,646 cal | 0.76 lb | 3.3 lb |
Real-world weight loss typically lands at 50 to 75% of the theoretical figure due to metabolic adaptation. Pair walking with even small dietary adjustments for stronger results. Walking does not earn you extra food.
For a 165 lb person walking briskly with average stride, each 1,000 steps burns about 44 calories. To create a 3,500-calorie deficit through walking alone, you'd need roughly 80,000 steps. About 8 weeks of 10,000 steps per day. Dietary changes matter: cutting 200 calories per day from your diet adds roughly the same deficit as walking 4,500 extra steps. Most successful weight-loss plans combine moderate walking with modest dietary discipline.
A 165 lb person walking briskly burns about 95 to 100 calories per mile. Lighter walkers burn less, heavier walkers more. Quick estimate: multiply body weight in pounds by 0.55 for moderate pace or 0.6 for brisk pace.
Roughly 100 to 250 calories depending on weight and pace. A 150 lb person at moderate pace burns about 130; at brisk pace about 170; at power-walk about 250.
Roughly 300 to 500 calories for most adults at brisk pace. A 165 lb person burns about 444 calories. Lighter walkers burn closer to 300; heavier can exceed 600.
Yes, significantly. Going from moderate (3 mph) to brisk (3.7 mph) increases burn by about 26%. Going from brisk to power-walk adds another 46%. Speeding up is one of the simplest ways to burn more calories without spending more time.
It can. Walking uphill at 10% grade has a MET around 7.0, equal to slow jogging on level ground. At 15%+ grades, uphill walking exceeds moderate jogging. Popular as a low-impact alternative to running.
Wearables use heart rate, GPS-measured pace, and learned stride patterns. They may also apply proprietary corrections. Differences of 10 to 25% are normal. Trust your tracker for personal trend tracking.
MET-based estimates are accurate to within ±20 to 30%. Use any single number as a planning estimate. The relative numbers (today vs. last week) are more reliable than absolute values.
Yes. Added weight is treated as if your body weight increased. Calorie burn scales with total mass.
A 150 lb person carrying a 20 lb backpack burns calories at the rate of a 170 lb walker, roughly 13% more than unloaded. Weighted vests are increasingly popular for fitness because they add intensity without changing pace or impact. Stick to vests or well-fitted backpacks. Ankle and wrist weights can alter gait and increase injury risk.
What we casually call "calories" on food labels and fitness trackers are actually kilocalories (kcal). One kcal equals 1,000 small calories (the scientific unit).
When this calculator says "you burned 200 calories," it means 200 kcal. The same units used on nutrition labels. The distinction matters in scientific contexts but not in everyday fitness tracking.
Yes. The 2024 Older Adult Compendium of Physical Activities found that walkers aged 60+ burn about 10% more calories at the same pace than younger walkers. Due to natural reductions in lean body mass, lower metabolic efficiency, and altered gait economy.
The calculator includes a "60+" toggle that applies this adjustment. For walkers under 60, the standard Adult Compendium values apply directly.
Yes. Nordic walking (with specially designed poles) engages the upper body and core in addition to the legs, raising calorie burn by about 20 to 40% over regular walking at the same pace.
At brisk pace, Nordic walking has a MET of 5.3 vs. 4.8 for regular brisk walking. The biggest advantage isn't the calorie boost but the upper-body strengthening and reduced lower-joint impact, especially valuable for older walkers and those recovering from injury.
Yes, when sustained alongside dietary adjustment. A 165 lb person walking briskly 45 min × 5 days/week burns ~1,420 calories/week, roughly 0.4 lb theoretical fat loss. Real-world results are typically 50 to 75% of theoretical due to metabolic adaptation.
The bigger benefits of walking are cardiovascular health, mood improvement, blood sugar regulation, and habit formation that supports other lifestyle changes.
We built this because most walking calculators only take time or distance, not both, and none of them let you enter step count. This one accepts all three inputs, uses real 2024 Compendium MET values, and adjusts for incline, load, and age (60+ walkers burn ~10% more at the same pace). This site is a part of the ads4good Network.
Read more about Utility Commons here